Research Insight

Genomic Insights into Tea Plant Immunity: Identifying Resistance Genes  

Jie Zhang1 , Baofu Huang2
1 Institute of Life Sciences, Jiyang Colloge of. Zhejiang A&F University, Zhuji, 311800, Zhejiang, China
2 Chinese Traditional Medicine Center, Cuixi Academy of Biotechnology, Zhuji, 311800, Zhejiang, China
Author    Correspondence author
Journal of Tea Science Research, 2024, Vol. 14, No. 4   doi: 10.5376/jtsr.2024.14.0021
Received: 20 Jun., 2024    Accepted: 15 Jul., 2024    Published: 18 Aug., 2024
© 2024 BioPublisher Publishing Platform
This is an open access article published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Preferred citation for this article:

Zhang J., and Huang B.F., 2024, Genomic insights into tea plant immunity: identifying resistance genes, Journal of Tea Science Research, 14(4): 225-237 (doi: 10.5376/jtsr.2024.14.0021)

Abstract

The tea plant (Camellia sinensis) is a globally important economic crop, and its immune mechanisms play a crucial role in ensuring tea yield and quality. This study focuses on tea plant immunity, systematically exploring the identification and functions of disease-resistance genes. The findings reveal that disease-resistance genes in tea plants are primarily concentrated in the nucleotide-binding site-leucine-rich repeat (NBS-LRR) family, as well as related genes such as receptor-like kinases (RLKs) and receptor-like proteins (RLPs). These genes activate the tea plant immune system by recognizing pathogen effector proteins, providing critical defense against fungi, bacteria, and viruses. This study enhances the understanding of tea plant immune mechanisms and offers a theoretical foundation for developing new tea plant varieties with strong disease resistance and high adaptability. In the future, further integration of multi-omics data and artificial intelligence analysis is expected to facilitate the discovery of novel disease-resistance genes and optimize strategies for breeding disease-resistant tea plants.

Keywords
Tea plant (Camellia sinensis); Resistance genes; Plant immunity; Transcriptome analysis; microRNAs; NLR genes; Disease resistance

1 Introduction

The tea plant, Camellia sinensis, is a globally significant cash crop, renowned for producing one of the world's most consumed beverages—tea. This plant is not only vital for its economic value but also for its cultural and social importance across various regions. The cultivation of tea plants spans numerous countries, with China being a leading producer and researcher in this field. The tea plant's leaves are rich in essential compounds that contribute to the unique flavor and health benefits of tea, making it a critical subject of agricultural and biochemical research (Chen et al., 2023).

 

Disease resistance is paramount for maintaining the productivity and quality of tea plants. Pathogens and pests pose significant threats to tea cultivation, leading to substantial economic losses and reduced crop yields. Enhancing disease resistance in tea plants is crucial for sustainable tea production, ensuring the stability of supply and the economic viability of tea farming communities (Xia et al., 2020). Understanding and improving the genetic basis of disease resistance can help mitigate these challenges and promote healthier, more resilient tea crops.

 

Plant immunity involves a complex network of defense mechanisms that protect against pathogens. Central to this defense system are resistance (R) genes, which encode proteins that recognize specific pathogen effectors and trigger immune responses. These R genes play a critical role in the plant's ability to detect and respond to infections, thereby conferring resistance to a wide range of diseases. In tea plants, the identification and functional analysis of R genes are essential for developing disease-resistant varieties and improving overall plant health (Xia et al., 2020).

 

This study aims to provide comprehensive genomic insights into the immunity of tea plants by identifying and characterizing resistance genes. By leveraging advanced genomic technologies and bioinformatics tools, this study seeks to uncover the genetic basis of disease resistance in Camellia sinensis. The findings will contribute to the development of disease-resistant tea varieties, enhancing the sustainability and productivity of tea cultivation. This study will also offer valuable resources for future functional genomic studies and breeding programs hoped at improving tea plant resilience and quality.

 

2 Tea Plant Immunity: An Overview

2.1 General mechanisms of plant immunity: PTI (pattern-triggered immunity) and ETI (effector-triggered immunity)

Plants have evolved sophisticated immune systems to defend against a wide array of pathogens. The two primary layers of plant immunity are Pattern-Triggered Immunity (PTI) and Effector-Triggered Immunity (ETI). PTI is initiated when pattern-recognition receptors (PRRs) on the cell surface detect pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), which are conserved microbial signatures. This recognition triggers a cascade of defense responses aimed at halting pathogen invasion (Tsuda and Katagiri, 2010; Bigeard et al., 2015; Yuan et al., 2021a).

 

ETI, on the other hand, is activated by the recognition of specific pathogen effectors by intracellular nucleotide-binding leucine-rich repeat receptors (NLRs). These effectors are typically proteins secreted by pathogens to suppress PTI and facilitate infection. Upon effector recognition, NLRs undergo conformational changes that lead to a robust and often localized immune response, which is generally more intense and sustained than PTI (Kadota et al., 2019; Nguyen et al., 2021; Yuan et al., 2021b). Despite their distinct initiation mechanisms, PTI and ETI share several downstream signaling components and can exhibit crosstalk, enhancing the overall immune response (Nguyen et al., 2021; Yuan et al., 2021a; 2021b).

 

2.2 Specific pathogens affecting tea plants (e.g., fungi, bacteria, and viruses)

Tea plants (Camellia sinensis) are susceptible to a variety of pathogens, including fungi, bacteria, and viruses, which can significantly impact tea production and quality. Fungal pathogens such as Exobasidium vexans, responsible for blister blight, and Pestalotiopsis spp., causing grey blight, are among the most common and damaging to tea plants. Bacterial pathogens like Xanthomonas campestris pv. theicola, which causes bacterial leaf blight, also pose a significant threat. Additionally, viral infections, although less common, can lead to diseases such as tea mosaic virus, which affects the overall health and yield of tea plants (Gouveia et al., 2017).

 

2.3 How immune responses are activated in tea plants

The activation of immune responses in tea plants follows the general principles of PTI and ETI. Upon detection of PAMPs by PRRs, tea plants initiate PTI, which includes the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascades, and expression of defense-related genes (Bigeard et al., 2015; Yuan et al., 2021b). These responses help to fortify the plant cell wall, produce antimicrobial compounds, and initiate other defense mechanisms to restrict pathogen growth.

 

When pathogens deploy effectors to suppress PTI, tea plants rely on ETI for defense. NLRs within the plant cells recognize these effectors, leading to a more robust immune response. This includes enhanced ROS production, hypersensitive response (HR) leading to localized cell death to contain the pathogen, and systemic acquired resistance (SAR) that primes the entire plant for heightened defense (Zhang and Zhou, 2010; Kadota et al., 2019; Yuan et al., 2021b). The interplay between PTI and ETI ensures a comprehensive defense strategy, allowing tea plants to effectively combat a wide range of pathogens.

 

3 Genomic Approaches to Understanding Tea Plant Immunity

3.1 Genome sequencing of Camellia sinensis

Recent advancements in genome sequencing technologies have significantly enhanced our understanding of the tea plant (Camellia sinensis) (Chen and Zhao, 2024). High-quality genome assemblies have been developed using a combination of Illumina and PacBio sequencing technologies, providing comprehensive insights into the genetic makeup of tea plants. For instance, the genome of Camellia sinensis var. sinensis (CSS) has been sequenced, revealing that 64% of its 3.1-Gb genome consists of repetitive sequences, and identifying 33,932 high-confidence protein-coding genes (Wei et al., 2018). Additionally, the reference genome of tea plant, consisting of 15 pseudo-chromosomes, has been established, highlighting the role of LTR retrotransposons in genome size expansion and gene diversification (Xia et al., 2020).

 

The genome sequencing of tea plants has uncovered several key insights related to plant immunity. Whole-genome duplications (WGDs) and subsequent paralogous duplications have been shown to significantly impact the copy numbers of genes involved in secondary metabolite production, which are crucial for tea quality and defense mechanisms (Wei et al., 2018). Furthermore, genes associated with stress resistance, such as those involved in terpene biosynthesis, have been found to be significantly amplified, forming gene clusters through recent tandem duplications (Xia et al., 2020). These findings suggest that the tea plant genome has evolved specific mechanisms to enhance its defense capabilities against various biotic and abiotic stresses.

 

3.2 Transcriptomic studies on tea plant defense responses

Transcriptomic studies have provided valuable insights into the gene expression profiles of tea plants in response to pathogen attacks. For example, the transcriptomic analysis of tea plants infected with Colletotrichum fructicola revealed differential expression of thousands of genes between resistant and susceptible cultivars. These differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were enriched in pathways related to sugar metabolism, phytohormones, reactive oxygen species (ROS), and biotic stimuli, indicating a complex network of defense responses (Wang et al., 2018). Additionally, transcriptomic profiling of tea plants attacked by tea geometrids (Ectropis obliqua) showed that the jasmonic acid (JA) signaling pathway was activated in response to herbivory, highlighting the systemic defense mechanisms in tea plants (Zhou et al., 2020).

 

Key genes involved in tea plant defense pathways have been identified through transcriptomic analyses. For instance, the study on tea plants' response to anthracnose identified 88 key genes involved in hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) metabolism, cell death, secondary metabolism, and carbohydrate metabolism, which are crucial for defense against the pathogen (Wang et al., 2018). Moreover, the identification of microRNAs (miRNAs) and their targets in response to Colletotrichum gloeosporioides infection (Figure 1) has revealed regulatory networks that modulate gene expression related to auxin pathways, ROS scavenging, and salicylic acid-mediated pathways, further elucidating the molecular mechanisms underlying tea plant immunity (Jeyaraj et al., 2019).

 

Figure 1 The hypothetical model of regulatory networks of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides-responsive miRNAs and their target genes in tea plant (Adopted from Jeyaraj et al., 2019)

 

3.3 Comparative genomics for resistance gene identification

Comparative genomics has been instrumental in identifying conserved resistance (R) genes across different species. By comparing the tea plant genome with those of related species, researchers have been able to identify conserved gene families and pathways involved in plant immunity. For example, the amplification and transcriptional divergence of genes encoding acyltransferases and leucoanthocyanidin reductases, which are associated with the accumulation of catechins in tea leaves, have been linked to defense mechanisms (Wei et al., 2018). Additionally, the identification of pathogenesis-related (PR) genes, such as the PR-1 gene family, has provided insights into the conserved defense responses in tea plants (Zhang et al., 2022b).

 

Insights from related species have been applied to enhance tea plant resistance. For instance, the study of isopentenyl transferase (IPT) genes, which play key roles in cytokinin signaling and stress responses, has revealed their involvement in tea plant development and resistance to abiotic stresses (Zhang et al., 2022a). Furthermore, the identification of salicylic acid carboxyl glucosyltransferase (CsUGT87E7) in tea plants, which regulates disease resistance by modulating salicylic acid homeostasis, highlights the potential for leveraging knowledge from other species to improve tea plant immunity (Hu et al., 2021). These comparative genomic approaches provide a valuable framework for developing tea cultivars with enhanced resistance to various stresses.

 

4 Identifying Resistance Genes in Tea Plants

4.1 Resistance gene families in tea plants

Nucleotide-binding site-leucine-rich repeat (NBS-LRR) genes are a predominant class of resistance (R) genes in plants, playing a crucial role in recognizing and responding to pathogen attacks. These genes are characterized by their conserved NBS domain and variable LRR domain, which together facilitate pathogen recognition and signal transduction (Shi et al., 2018; Shao et al., 2019; Wang et al., 2020). NBS-LRR genes can be further classified into subfamilies based on their N-terminal domains, such as TIR-NBS-LRR (TNL) and CC-NBS-LRR (CNL) (Shao et al., 2019; Wei et al., 2020). Other R-gene families include receptor-like kinases (RLKs) and receptor-like proteins (RLPs), which also contribute to plant immunity by recognizing pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) and initiating defense responses (Song et al., 2019).

 

In tea plants, several resistance genes have been identified and characterized. For instance, the SpNBS-LRR gene in tomato (Solanum pimpinellifolium) has been shown to confer resistance to Phytophthora infestans, highlighting the potential for similar genes in tea plants to provide resistance against specific pathogens (Jiang et al., 2018). Additionally, the BSR1 gene from Brachypodium distachyon, which confers resistance to Barley stripe mosaic virus, exemplifies the functional diversity and importance of NBS-LRR genes in plant immunity (Wu et al., 2022). These examples underscore the significance of identifying and characterizing resistance genes in tea plants to enhance their disease resistance.

 

4.2 Functional genomics for resistance gene characterization

Functional genomics approaches, such as transcriptome analysis and gene expression profiling, are essential for validating the function of resistance genes in tea plants. These methods allow researchers to identify differentially expressed genes in response to pathogen infection and to correlate specific gene expression patterns with resistance phenotypes (Wang et al., 2020; Jiang et al., 2023). For example, transcriptome data from sugarcane revealed that differentially expressed NBS-LRR genes were predominantly derived from Saccharum spontaneum, contributing to disease resistance in modern sugarcane cultivars (Jiang et al., 2023).

 

Advanced genetic engineering techniques, such as CRISPR/Cas9 and RNA interference (RNAi), have revolutionized the study of resistance genes in plants. CRISPR/Cas9 allows for precise genome editing to knock out or modify specific genes, enabling the functional analysis of candidate resistance genes. RNAi, on the other hand, can be used to silence gene expression, providing insights into the role of specific genes in plant immunity (Cai et al., 2021). These techniques have been successfully applied in various plant species and hold great promise for elucidating the function of resistance genes in tea plants.

 

4.3 Evolution of resistance genes

The evolution of R genes in tea plants is driven by the need to adapt to diverse and evolving pathogen populations. This evolutionary process involves gene duplication, diversification, and selection, leading to the expansion of R gene families and the emergence of novel resistance specificities (Song et al., 2019; Wei et al., 2020). For instance, in Arachis hypogaea, young NBS-LRR genes have been shown to play a crucial role in disease resistance, indicating ongoing evolutionary adaptation (Song et al., 2019). Similarly, in sugarcane, whole genome duplication and gene expansion have contributed to the diversity and functionality of NBS-LRR genes (Jiang et al., 2023).

 

Analyzing the genetic diversity of resistance genes in tea plants is essential for understanding their evolutionary dynamics and potential for breeding disease-resistant cultivars. Comparative genomic studies and phylogenetic analyses can reveal the extent of genetic variation and the evolutionary relationships among R genes in different plant species (Wei et al., 2020; Andolfo et al., 2022). For example, phylogenetic analysis of NBS-LRR genes in Solanum pimpinellifolium and Arabidopsis thaliana has shown significant genetic variation and species-specific expansion, highlighting the importance of genetic diversity in plant immunity (Wei et al., 2020). Such analyses provide valuable insights into the genetic basis of resistance and guide the development of improved tea plant varieties.

 

5 Case Studies

5.1 Case study 1: tea plant response to fungal pathogens

Tea plants, like many other crops, face significant threats from fungal pathogens. The identification and understanding of resistance (R) genes are crucial for developing disease-resistant varieties. Research has shown that R genes in plants often encode proteins that function as receptors, either on the cell surface or intracellularly, to detect pathogen-derived molecules and trigger immune responses (Kourelis and Hoorn, 2018; Ngou et al., 2022). For instance, the study of the B. napus-L. maculans pathosystem revealed that resistance involves early cellular reprogramming coordinated by specific transcription factors and signaling pathways, such as those involving jasmonic acid and calcium (Becker et al., 2019). Additionally, the identification of a truncated CRINKLY4 kinase in common beans, which confers resistance to Colletotrichum lindemuthianum, highlights the diversity of R gene mechanisms (Richard et al., 2021). These insights are pivotal for understanding how tea plants might similarly activate resistance genes in response to fungal infections.

 

5.2 Case study 2: bacterial disease resistance in tea plants

Bacterial diseases pose a significant threat to tea plants, necessitating the identification of effective R genes. Studies have shown that plant resistance to bacterial pathogens often involves nucleotide-binding leucine-rich repeat receptors (NLRs) and pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) that detect pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs). For example, the interaction between PRR- and NLR-mediated immunity has been extensively studied, revealing complex signaling networks that enhance plant defense (Ngou et al., 2022) (Figure 2). Furthermore, the role of small RNAs in modulating host immunity has been highlighted, with certain fungal microRNA-like RNAs shown to suppress host receptor-like kinase genes, thereby facilitating pathogen infection (Xu et al., 2022). These findings suggest that similar mechanisms may be at play in tea plants, where the identification and functional characterization of R genes can lead to improved bacterial disease resistance.

 

Figure 2 Plant immune signaling pathways (Adopted from Ngou et al., 2022)

Image caption: A, PRR signaling pathway. Ligand perception by PRRs activates multiple kinases, which leads to calcium influx to the cytosol, ROS production, transcriptional reprogramming, and callose deposition. B, Singleton NLR signaling pathway. The ZAR1/RKS1 heterodimer detects the effector AvrAC via association with uridylylated PBL2 by AvrAC. This leads to the activation and oligomerization of ZAR1. The ZAR1 resistosome localizes to the PM and triggers calcium influx, which leads to the HR and cell rupture. C, Helper-NLR-dependent sensor NLR signaling pathway. Recognition of ATR1 by the TNL RPP1 leads to oligomerization and the induced proximity of TIR domains. The TIR domain exhibits NADase activity and produces v-cADPR, which might activate EP-proteins and the helper NLRs (RNLs). Following TNL activation, EP-proteins and RNLs associate with each other and activate downstream immune responses, likely via cation channel activity from the helper NLRs. Timeline on the right indicates the order and duration of each signaling event following ligand/effector perception. Numbers indicate the corresponding signaling events in the figure on the left. Note that the activation of ETI is usually preceded by PTI activation, and the strength and duration of each event vary and are dependent on the PRRs/NLRs that are activated (Adopted from Ngou et al., 2022)

 

5.3 Case study 3: viral pathogen resistance mechanisms

Viral pathogens are another major concern for tea cultivation. The resistance mechanisms against viral infections in plants often involve complex interactions between host and pathogen proteins. Research has identified various R genes that play a crucial role in recognizing viral effectors and triggering immune responses (Kourelis and Hoorn, 2018). For instance, the study of effector-triggered immunity (ETI) has shown that the recognition of pathogen avirulence (AVR) proteins by plant R proteins can lead to a robust immune response. Additionally, the structural analysis of AVR effectors and their interactions with plant R proteins has provided deeper insights into the molecular basis of resistance (Lazar et al., 2020). These genomic insights are essential for understanding how tea plants can resist viral pathogens and for developing strategies to enhance their viral resistance.

 

6 Breeding and Biotechnological Applications

6.1 Marker-assisted breeding for disease resistance

Marker-assisted selection (MAS) has become a pivotal tool in enhancing tea plant breeding programs, particularly for disease resistance. The identification of molecular markers linked to resistance traits allows for the selection of superior genotypes with greater precision and efficiency. For instance, the identification of an EST-SSR molecular marker associated with Blister blight resistance in tea (Camellia sinensis) has marked a significant milestone in tea molecular breeding. This marker, EST-SSR073, has been validated across multiple tea cultivars and can be effectively used to expedite breeding programs by selecting for Blister blight resistance (Karunarathna et al., 2020).

 

Moreover, the application of MAS in other crops, such as coffee, has demonstrated the potential for transferring disease resistance alleles from different species, thereby enhancing the genetic diversity and resilience of cultivated varieties. For example, molecular markers linked to resistance genes in coffee have been successfully used to identify and select resistant individuals, facilitating preventive breeding against multiple diseases (Alkimim et al., 2017). These advancements underscore the potential of MAS to revolutionize tea breeding by integrating resistance traits more efficiently and accurately.

 

6.2 Biotechnological tools for enhancing tea plant immunity

6.2.1 Role of gene editing (e.g., CRISPR/Cas9) and transgenic approaches

Gene editing technologies, such as CRISPR/Cas9, and transgenic approaches offer powerful tools for enhancing tea plant immunity. These biotechnological methods enable precise modifications of the plant genome to introduce or enhance resistance traits. CRISPR/Cas9, for instance, allows for targeted editing of specific genes associated with disease resistance, providing a means to develop tea plants with improved immunity against pathogens. This technology has been successfully applied in various crops to enhance resistance by knocking out susceptibility genes or introducing resistance genes (Michelmore, 1995; McDowell and Woffenden, 2003).

 

Transgenic approaches involve the introduction of foreign genes into the tea plant genome to confer resistance. This method has been used to introduce resistance genes from other species, thereby broadening the spectrum of resistance in tea plants. For example, the introduction of resistance genes from other Coffea species into Arabica coffee has resulted in plants with enhanced resistance to multiple diseases (Alkimim et al., 2017). These approaches hold promise for developing tea plants with robust and durable resistance to a wide range of pathogens.

 

6.2.2 Current progress in biotechnological advancements for tea plant immunity

Recent advancements in biotechnological tools have significantly contributed to the understanding and enhancement of tea plant immunity. The identification and characterization of resistance gene analogs (RGAs) in various crops have provided insights into the genetic basis of disease resistance. For instance, the genomic survey of RGAs in sugarcane has revealed the differential expression of these genes in response to pathogen infection, highlighting their potential as markers for breeding pathogen-resistant crops (Rody et al., 2019).

 

Furthermore, the integration of genomic selection models in breeding programs has shown promise in predicting and selecting for disease resistance traits. These models utilize high-density marker arrays and extensive phenotyping data to predict the genomic estimated breeding values of untested genotypes, thereby accelerating the breeding process (Poland and Rutkoski, 2016; Miedaner et al., 2020). The application of these models in tea breeding could enhance the selection of disease-resistant varieties, ultimately improving crop resilience and productivity.

 

7 Challenges and Future Directions

7.1 Challenges in identifying and characterizing R genes in tea plants

Identifying and characterizing resistance (R) genes in tea plants presents several challenges. One significant hurdle is the complex genomic organization of R genes, which often exist in clusters and exhibit high variability (Michelmore and Meyers, 1998; van Wersch and Li, 2019). This clustering can complicate the identification process, as traditional methods may not capture the full repertoire of R genes due to repeat masking during genome annotation (Andolfo et al., 2022). Additionally, the hypervariability in the leucine-rich repeat (LRR) regions of these genes, driven by divergent selection, further complicates their characterization (Michelmore and Meyers, 1998). The intricate nature of plant immune responses, involving both qualitative and quantitative resistance mechanisms, adds another layer of complexity (Kushalappa et al., 2016; Delplace et al., 2020). Moreover, the polyploidy and heterozygosity of many plant genomes, including tea, pose additional challenges for large-scale R gene prediction and functional validation (Rody et al., 2019).

 

7.2 Integrating genomic, transcriptomic, and functional data for comprehensive understanding

To achieve a comprehensive understanding of R genes in tea plants, it is essential to integrate genomic, transcriptomic, and functional data. Advances in sequencing technologies and bioinformatics tools have made it possible to identify R genes through genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and whole-genome sequencing (WGS) (Zaimah, 2019). Combining these genomic approaches with transcriptomic analyses can reveal differentially expressed R genes in response to pathogen infection, providing insights into their functional roles (Rody et al., 2019). Functional validation through gene editing and mutational analysis can further elucidate the mechanisms by which these genes confer resistance (Delplace et al., 2020). Network analysis and machine learning algorithms can also play a crucial role in identifying novel R genes and understanding their interactions within the plant immune system (Stotz et al., 2017). By integrating these diverse data sources, researchers can develop a more holistic view of tea plant immunity and identify key targets for breeding and genetic engineering.

 

7.3 Future research avenues: gene editing for enhanced resistance, breeding for durable immunity

Future research should focus on leveraging gene editing technologies, such as CRISPR/Cas9, to enhance resistance in tea plants. Gene editing can be used to introduce or modify R genes to confer broad-spectrum and durable resistance against multiple pathogens (Kourelis and Hoorn, 2018; Ngou et al., 2022). Additionally, breeding programs should aim to incorporate both qualitative and quantitative resistance traits to develop cultivars with robust and long-lasting immunity (Kushalappa et al., 2016; Delplace et al., 2020). Understanding the evolutionary dynamics of R gene clusters and their functional interactions can inform strategies for stacking multiple R genes to achieve synergistic effects (van Wersch and Li, 2019). Furthermore, exploring the role of epigenetic modifications and small RNAs in regulating R gene expression could provide new avenues for enhancing plant immunity (Zaimah, 2019). By integrating these approaches, researchers can develop innovative strategies to protect tea plants from emerging diseases and ensure sustainable tea production.

 

8 Ecological and Environmental Impact of Genomic Research

8.1 How identifying resistance genes can influence sustainable tea farming

Identifying resistance genes in tea plants can significantly influence sustainable tea farming by enhancing the plants' natural defenses against pathogens. This genomic insight allows for the development of tea varieties that are inherently resistant to diseases, reducing the need for chemical interventions. For instance, the discovery of disease-resistance genes (R genes) that encode immune receptors with nucleotide-binding sites and leucine-rich repeat domains can lead to the creation of tea plants that can better withstand pathogen attacks (Fernandez-Gutierrez and Gutierrez-Gonzalez, 2021). This approach not only promotes healthier crops but also aligns with ecological farming practices by minimizing the environmental footprint associated with pesticide use.

 

8.2 Role of disease-resistant varieties in reducing pesticide use

The cultivation of disease-resistant tea plant varieties plays a crucial role in reducing pesticide use. By leveraging genetic resistance, farmers can decrease their reliance on chemical pesticides, which are often harmful to the environment and human health. For example, the use of genetically resistant crops has been shown to limit the population of vector organisms that spread plant viruses, thereby reducing the need for excessive pesticide applications (Nicaise, 2014). Additionally, the development of crops with durable disease resistance through genetic modifications, such as the decoy approach in Arabidopsis thaliana, can further enhance crop yields while reducing the necessity for chemical treatments (Kim et al., 2016). This shift towards genetically resistant varieties supports more sustainable agricultural practices and contributes to the overall reduction of pesticide usage.

 

8.3 Balancing genetic diversity and breeding for resistance

Balancing genetic diversity with the breeding of disease-resistant tea plants is essential to maintain the long-term sustainability of tea farming. While breeding for resistance is crucial, it is equally important to preserve the genetic diversity within tea plant populations to prevent the emergence of new pathogen strains that could overcome the resistance. The genomic differentiation observed in various plant species, such as the two-spotted spider mite, highlights the importance of maintaining genetic diversity to ensure the adaptability and resilience of crops (Xue et al., 2023). Moreover, the genomic studies on tea plants have revealed significant signatures of domestication and modern breeding, emphasizing the need to balance these efforts with the conservation of genetic diversity to support ongoing adaptation and resistance (Xia et al., 2020) (Figure 3). By integrating genomic research with traditional breeding practices, it is possible to develop tea plant varieties that are both resistant to diseases and genetically diverse, ensuring the sustainability and ecological balance of tea farming.

 

Figure 3 Population Structure of Tea Plants and Gene Flow (Adopted from Xia et al., 2020)

Image caption: (A) Sample collections. (B) Phylogenetic relationships of all the accessions. The accessions from Laos, Iran, Azerbaijan, and Russia are indicated in the tree by colored stars. Hollow circle represents landrace accessions. (C) Population structure of the tea plant collections. The dashed rectangle represents the best inferred K value with lowest cross-validation errors. (D) Principal component analyses (PCA) of the collected populations. (E) LD decay in all collected tea plant accessions and different subpopulations. (F) Nucleotide diversity (θπ) and genetic differentiation (Fst) within different tea plant subpopulations calculated using the sliding-window approach (1-Mb windows with 1-Mb steps). The circle size represents the mean value of θπ in each subpopulation. The numbers marked between each subpopulation indicate the Weir and Cockerham weighted Fst values. (G) Tajima's D estimation in tea plant subpopulations. Only the sites in genic regions were included in the calculations. (H) Population splits and migrations between the ancient, landrace, elite, and wild tea plant accessions. (I) Population splits and migrations between accessions from different countries. (J) Population splits and migrations among accessions from different provinces of China. The provinces with fewer than one accession were excluded.In (H) to (J), the line between each branch indicates possible migration events. Color scale indicates the weight of migration edges. Red color indicates strong migration weight and yellow indicates low or moderate weight. The drift parameter is a relative temporal measure, and the scale bar indicates 10 times the average SE of the relatedness among populations based on the variance–covariance matrix of allele frequencies (Adopted from Xia et al., 2020)

 

9 Concluding Remarks

This study has provided significant insights into the genomic basis of tea plant immunity, particularly focusing on the identification and characterization of resistance (R) genes. Key findings include the identification of various R genes and their associated molecular mechanisms, such as the role of nucleotide-binding leucine-rich repeat receptors (NLRs) in recognizing pathogen effectors and activating immune responses. Additionally, transcriptome analyses have revealed candidate genes involved in defense against specific diseases like blister blight and gray blight, highlighting the dynamic roles of defense genes and regulatory networks in tea plant immunity.

 

The genomic insights gained from this study have substantial potential for improving tea plant immunity. By understanding the molecular mechanisms and regulatory networks underlying tea plant resistance, it is possible to develop targeted breeding strategies and genetic engineering approaches to enhance disease resistance. For instance, the identification of key regulatory genes such as CsUGT87E7, which modulates salicylic acid homeostasis and disease resistance, provides a valuable target for genetic manipulation. Furthermore, the clustering of NLR genes and their cooperative action in triggering immunity can be leveraged to design more robust and broad-spectrum resistance traits in tea plants.

 

Advancing research in tea plant resistance gene discovery will require a multidisciplinary approach, combining experimental and computational techniques. The integration of multi-omics data, such as transcriptomics, sRNAome, and degradome sequencing, will be crucial for uncovering the complex regulatory networks involved in tea plant immunity. Additionally, leveraging machine learning algorithms and network analysis can further enhance the identification of novel resistance genes and their functional characterization. Continued efforts in this field will not only improve our understanding of tea plant immunity but also contribute to the development of disease-resistant tea cultivars, ensuring sustainable tea production in the face of evolving pathogen threats.

 

Acknowledgments

The authors extend thanks to the two anonymous peer reviewers for their valuable revision recommendations.

 

Conflict of Interest Disclosure

The authors affirm that this research was conducted without any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

 

Reference

Alkimim E.R., Caixeta E.T., Sousa T.V., Pereira A.A., de Oliveira A.C.B., Zambolim L., and Sakiyama N.S., 2017, Marker-assisted selection provides Arabica coffee with genes from other Coffea species targeting on multiple resistance to rust and coffee berry disease, Molecular Breeding, 37: 1-10. 

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-016-0609-1

 

Andolfo G., Dohm J.C., and Himmelbauer H., 2022, Prediction of NB‐LRR resistance genes based on full‐length sequence homology, The Plant Journal, 110(6): 1592-1602. 

https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.15756

 

Becker M.G., Haddadi P., Wan J., Adam L., Walker P., Larkan N., Daayf F., Borhan M., and Belmonte M.F., 2019, Transcriptome analysis of Rlm2-mediated host immunity in the Brassica napusLeptosphaeria maculans pathosystem, Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, 32(8): 1001-1012. 

https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-01-19-0028-R

 

Bigeard J., Colcombet J., and Hirt H., 2015, Signaling mechanisms in pattern-triggered immunity (PTI), Molecular Plant, 8(4): 521-539. 

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2014.12.022

 

Cai H., Wang W., Rui L., Han L., Luo M., Liu N., and Tang D., 2021, The TIR‐NBS protein TN13 associates with the CC‐NBS‐LRR resistance protein RPS5 and contributes to RPS5‐triggered immunity in Arabidopsis, The Plant Journal, 107(3): 775-786. 

https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.15345

 

Chen Y., Li Y., Shen C., and Xiao L., 2023, Topics and trends in fresh tea (Camellia sinensis) leaf research: A comprehensive bibliometric study, Frontiers in Plant Science, 14: 1092511. 

https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1092511

 

Delplace F., Huard-Chauveau C., Dubiella U., Khafif M., Alvarez E., Langin G., Roux F., Peyraud R., and Roby D., 2020, Robustness of plant quantitative disease resistance is provided by a decentralized immune network, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(30): 18099-18109. 

https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2000078117

 

Fernandez-Gutierrez A., and Gutierrez-Gonzalez J.J., 2021, Bioinformatic-based approaches for disease-resistance gene discovery in plants, Agronomy, 11(11): 2259. 

https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11112259

 

Gouveia B.C., Calil I.P., Machado J.P.B., Santos A.A., and Fontes E.P., 2017, Immune receptors and co-receptors in antiviral innate immunity in plants, Frontiers in Microbiology, 7: 2139. 

https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.02139

 

Hu Y., Zhang M., Lu M., Wu Y., Jing T., Zhao M., Zhao Y., Feng Y., Wang J., Gao T., Zhou Z., Wu B., Jiang H., Wan X., Schwab W., and Song C., 2021, Salicylic acid carboxyl glucosyltransferase UGT87E7 regulates disease resistance in Camellia sinensis, Plant Physiology, 188(3): 1507-1520. 

https://doi.org/10.1093/plphys/kiab569

 

Jeyaraj A., Wang X., Wang S., Liu S., Zhang R., Wu A., and Wei C., 2019, Identification of regulatory networks of microRNAs and their targets in response to Colletotrichum gloeosporioides in tea plant (Camellia sinensis L.), Frontiers in Plant Science, 10: 1096. 

https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01096

 

Jiang N., Cui J., Meng J., and Luan Y., 2018, A tomato nucleotide binding sites− leucine-rich repeat gene is positively involved in plant resistance to Phytophthora infestans, Phytopathology, 108(8): 980-987. 

https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-12-17-0389-R

 

Jiang Z., Zhao M., Qin H., Li S., and Yang X., 2023, Genome-wide analysis of NBS-LRR genes revealed contribution of disease resistance from Saccharum spontaneum to modern sugarcane cultivar, Frontiers in Plant Science, 14: 1091567. 

https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1091567

 

Kadota Y., Liebrand T., Goto Y., Skłenar J., Derbyshire P., Menke F., Torres M., Molina A., Zipfel C., Coaker G., and Shirasu K., 2019, Quantitative phosphoproteomic analysis reveals common regulatory mechanisms between effector‐and PAMP‐triggered immunity in plants, New Phytologist, 221(4): 2160-2175. 

https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.15523

 

Karunarathna K.H.T., Mewan K.M., Weerasena O.V.D.S.J., Perera S.A.C.N., and Edirisinghe E.N.U., 2021, A functional molecular marker for detecting blister blight disease resistance in tea (Camellia sinensis L.), Plant Cell Reports, 40: 351-359. 

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-020-02637-6

 

Kim S.H., Qi D., Ashfield T., Helm M., and Innes R.W., 2016, Using decoys to expand the recognition specificity of a plant disease resistance protein, Science, 351(6274): 684-687. 

https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad3436

 

Kourelis J., and Van Der Hoorn R.A., 2018, Defended to the nines: 25 years of resistance gene cloning identifies nine mechanisms for R protein function, The Plant Cell, 30(2): 285-299. 

https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.17.00579

 

Kushalappa A.C., Yogendra K.N., and Karre S., 2016, Plant innate immune response: qualitative and quantitative resistance, Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 35(1): 38-55. 

https://doi.org/10.1080/07352689.2016.1148980

 

Lazar N., Mesarich C., Petit-Houdenot Y., Talbi N., Sierra-Gallay I., Zélie E., Blondeau K., Gracy J., Ollivier B., Blaise F., Rouxel T., Balesdent M., Idnurm A., Tilbeurgh H., and Fudal I., 2020, A new family of structurally conserved fungal effectors displays epistatic interactions with plant resistance proteins, PLoS Pathogens, 18(7): e1010664. 

https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.17.423041

 

McDowell J.M., and Woffenden B.J., 2003, Plant disease resistance genes: recent insights and potential applications, Trends in Biotechnology, 21(4): 178-183. 

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7799(03)00053-2

 

Michelmore R.W., and Meyers B.C., 1998, Clusters of resistance genes in plants evolve by divergent selection and a birth-and-death process, Genome Research, 8(11): 1113-1130. 

https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.8.11.1113

 

Michelmore R., 1995, Molecular approaches to manipulation of disease resistance genes, Annual Review of Phytopathology, 33(1): 393-427. 

https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.py.33.090195.002141

 

Miedaner T., Boeven A.L.G.C., Gaikpa D.S., Kistner M.B., and Grote C.P., 2020, Genomics-assisted breeding for quantitative disease resistances in small-grain cereals and maize, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 21(24): 9717. 

https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21249717

 

Ngou B.P.M., Ding P., and Jones J.D., 2022, Thirty years of resistance: Zig-zag through the plant immune system, The Plant Cell, 34(5): 1447-1478. 

https://doi.org/10.1093/plcell/koac041

 

Nguyen Q.M., Iswanto A.B.B., Son G.H., and Kim S.H., 2021, Recent advances in effector-triggered immunity in plants: New pieces in the puzzle create a different paradigm, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 22(9): 4709. 

https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22094709

 

Nicaise V., 2014, Crop immunity against viruses: Outcomes and future challenges, Frontiers in Plant Science, 5: 660. 

https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00660

 

Poland J., and Rutkoski J., 2016, Advances and challenges in genomic selection for disease resistance, Annual Review of Phytopathology, 54(1): 79-98. 

https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-phyto-080615-100056

 

Richard M., Gratias A., Diaz J., Thareau V., Pflieger S., Meziadi C., Blanchet S., Marande W., Bitocchi E., Papa R., Miklas P., and Geffroy V., 2021, A common bean truncated CRINKLY4 kinase controls gene-for-gene resistance to the fungus Colletotrichum lindemuthianum, Journal of Experimental Botany, 72(10): 3569-3581. 

https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erab082

 

Rody H.V., Bombardelli R.G., Creste S., Camargo L.E., Van Sluys M.A., and Monteiro-Vitorello C.B., 2019, Genome survey of resistance gene analogs in sugarcane: Genomic features and differential expression of the innate immune system from a smut-resistant genotype, BMC Genomics, 20: 1-17. 

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-019-6207-y

 

Shao Z.Q., Xue J.Y., Wang Q., Wang B., and Chen J.Q., 2019, Revisiting the origin of plant NBS-LRR genes, Trends in Plant Science, 24(1): 9-12.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2018.10.015

 

Shi J., Zhang M., Zhai W., Meng J., Gao H., Zhang W., Han R., and Qi F., 2018, Genome-wide analysis of nucleotide binding site-leucine-rich repeats (NBS-LRR) disease resistance genes in Gossypium hirsutum, Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology, 104: 1-8. 

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmpp.2018.07.007

 

Song H., Guo Z., Hu X., Qian L., Miao F., Zhang X., and Chen J., 2019, Evolutionary balance between LRR domain loss and young NBS–LRR genes production governs disease resistance in Arachis hypogaea cv. Tifrunner, BMC Genomics, 20: 1-12. 

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-019-6212-1

 

Stotz H.U., de Oliveira Almeida R., Davey N., Steuber V., and Valente G.T., 2017, Review of combinations of experimental and computational techniques to identify and understand genes involved in innate immunity and effector-triggered defence, Methods, 131: 120-127. 

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2017.08.019

 

Tsuda K., and Katagiri F., 2010, Comparing signaling mechanisms engaged in pattern-triggered and effector-triggered immunity, Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 13(4): 459-465. 

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2010.04.006

 

van Wersch S., and Li X., 2019, Stronger when together: Clustering of plant NLR disease resistance genes, Trends in Plant Science, 24(8): 688-699. 

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2019.05.005

 

Wang T., Jia Z.H., Zhang J.Y., Liu M., Guo Z.R., and Wang G., 2020, Identification and analysis of NBS-LRR genes in Actinidia chinensis genome, Plants, 9(10): 1350. 

https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9101350

 

Wang Y., Hao X., Lu Q., Wang L., Qian W., Li N., Ding C., Wang X., and Yang Y., 2018, Transcriptional analysis and histochemistry reveal that hypersensitive cell death and H₂O₂ have crucial roles in the resistance of tea plant (Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze) to anthracnose, Horticulture Research, 5: 1-12. 

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41438-018-0025-2

 

Wei C., Yang H., Wang S., Zhao J., Liu C., Gao L., Xia E., Lu Y., Tai Y., She G., Sun J., Cao H., Tong W., Gao Q., Li Y., Deng W., Jiang X., Wang W., Chen Q., Zhang S., Li H., Wu J., Wang P., Li P., Shi C., Zheng F., Jian J., Huang B., Shan D., Shi M., Fang C., Yue Y., Li F., Li D., Wei S., Han B., Jiang C., Yin Y., Xia T., Zhang Z., Bennetzen J., Zhao S., and Wan X., 2018, Draft genome sequence of Camellia sinensis var. sinensis provides insights into the evolution of the tea genome and tea quality, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(18): E4151-E4158. 

https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1719622115

 

Wei H., Liu J., Guo Q., Pan L., Chai S., Cheng Y., Ruan M., Ye Q., Wang R., Yao Z., Zhou G., and Wan H., 2020, Genomic organization and comparative phylogenic analysis of NBS-LRR resistance gene family in Solanum pimpinellifolium and Arabidopsis thaliana, Evolutionary Bioinformatics, 16: 1176934320911055. 

https://doi.org/10.1177/1176934320911055

 

Wu Q., Cui Y., Jin X., Wang G., Yan L., Zhong C., Yu M., Li W., Wang Y., Wang L., Wang H., Dang C., Zhang X., Chen Y., Zhang P., Zhao X., Wu J., Fu D., Xia L., Nevo E., Vogel J., Huo N., Li D., Gu Y., Jackson A., Zhang Y., and Liu Z., 2022, The CC–NB–LRR protein BSR1 from Brachypodium confers resistance to Barley stripe mosaic virus in gramineous plants by recognising TGB1 movement protein, New Phytologist, 236(6): 2233-2248. 

https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.18457

 

Xia E., Tong W., Hou Y., An Y., Chen L., Wu Q., Liu Y., Yu J., Li F., Li R., Li P., Zhao H., Ge R., Huang J., Mallano A., Zhang Y., Liu S., Deng W., Song C., Zhang Z., Zhao J., Wei S., Zhang Z., Xia T., Wei C., and Wan X., 2020, The reference genome of tea plant and resequencing of 81 diverse accessions provide insights into its genome evolution and adaptation, Molecular Plant, 13(7): 1013-1026.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2020.04.010

 

Xu M., Li G., Guo Y., Gao Y., Zhu L., Liu Z., Tian R., Gao C., Han P., Wang N., Guo F., Bao J., Jia C., Feng H., and Huang L., 2022, A fungal microRNA‐like RNA subverts host immunity and facilitates pathogen infection by silencing two host receptor‐like kinase genes, New Phytologist, 233(6): 2503-2519. 

https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.17945

 

Xue W., Sun J., Witters J., Vandenhole M., Dermauw W., Bajda S., Simma E., Wybouw N., Villacis-Perez E., and Leeuwen T., 2023, Incomplete reproductive barriers and genomic differentiation impact the spread of resistance mutations between green‐and red‐colour morphs of a cosmopolitan mite pest, Molecular Ecology, 32(15): 4278-4297. 

https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.16994

 

Yuan M., Jiang Z., Bi G., Nomura K., Liu M., Wang Y., Cai B., Zhou J., He S., and Xin X., 2021b, Pattern-recognition receptors are required for NLR-mediated plant immunity, Nature, 592(7852): 105-109. 

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03316-6

 

Yuan M., Ngou B.P.M., Ding P., and Xin X.F., 2021, PTI-ETI crosstalk: An integrative view of plant immunity, Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 62: 102030. 

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2021.102030

 

Zaimah N.S., 2019, Plant resistance gene, SNP and genome annotation: An overview, Highlights in BioScience, 2: 1-6. 

https://doi.org/10.36462/h.biosci.20192

 

Zhang J., and Zhou J.M., 2010, Plant immunity triggered by microbial molecular signatures, Molecular Plant, 3(5): 783-793. 

https://doi.org/10.1093/mp/ssq035

 

Zhang L., Li M., Fu J., Huang X., Yan P., Ge S., Li Z., Bai P., Zhang L., Han W., and Li X., 2022a, Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of isopentenyl transferase family genes during development and resistance to abiotic stresses in tea plant (Camellia sinensis), Plants, 11(17): 2243. 

https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11172243

 

Zhang Q., Guo N., Zhang Y., Yu Y., and Liu S., 2022, Genome-wide characterization and expression analysis of pathogenesis-related 1 (PR-1) gene family in tea plant (Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze) in response to blister-blight disease stress, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23(3): 1292. 

https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23031292

 

Zhou Q., Zhao S., Zhu J., Li F., Tong W., Liu S., and Wei C., 2020, Transcriptomic analyses reveal a systemic defense role of the uninfested adjacent leaf in tea plant (Camellia sinensis) attacked by tea geometrids (Ectropis obliqua), Genomics, 112(5): 3658-3667. 

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygeno.2020.03.007

 

Journal of Tea Science Research
• Volume 14
View Options
. PDF(1001KB)
. FPDF(win)
. FPDF(mac)
. HTML
. Online fPDF
Associated material
. Readers' comments
Other articles by authors
. Jie Zhang
. Baofu Huang
Related articles
. Tea plant ( Camellia sinensis )
. Resistance genes
. Plant immunity
. Transcriptome analysis
. microRNAs
. NLR genes
. Disease resistance
Tools
. Email to a friend
. Post a comment