Research Article
Drought Induced Physiological and Biochemical Changes in Leaves of Developing Seedlings of Tea [Camellia sinensis (L) O Kuntze ] Cultivars
2 Microbial and Agricultural Ecology Laboratory, Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Assam (Central) University, Silchar, 788011, India
3 Plant Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Laboratory, School of Life sciences, Assam (Central) University, Silchar, 788011, India
Author Correspondence author
Journal of Tea Science Research, 2016, Vol. 6, No. 4 doi: 10.5376/jtsr.2016.06.0004
Received: 28 Oct., 2015 Accepted: 15 Dec., 2015 Published: 28 Jan., 2016
Upadhyaya H., Dutta B.K., and Panda S.K., 2016, Drought induced physiological and biochemical changes in leaves of developing seedlings of tea [Camellia sinensis (L) O Kuntze ] cultivars, Journal of Tea Science Research, 6(4), 1-11 (doi: 10.5376/jtsr.2016.06.0004)
Drought is one of the important environmental stress affecting agricultural productivity around the world. In this study, an attempt has been made to understand drought induced biochemical alterations in different clones of Camellia sinensis [TV-1, TV-20, TV-29 and TV-30]. Drought stress induced decrease in total chlorophyll and carotenoid, phenolics concentration and increases in proline concentration, lipid peroxidation and polyphenols oxidase activity as a consequent of decrease in leaf relative water content (RWC). Decreased Na+ and K+ concentration caused osmotic stress in leaves decreasing NR activity, and ultimately reducing leaf relative growth rate. Thus, drought induced a range of physiological and biochemical alterations causing membrane damage and loss in cellular functions ultimately leading to reduction in growth of one of the most important economic crop like tea. In comparison, TV-1 showed better drought tolerance by maintaining higher endogenous K+ and proline content and a balance Na+/K+ ratio in leaves.
1 Introduction
Drought is one of the more important environmental stresses affecting agricultural productivity around the world and may result in considerable yield reduction (Boyer 1982). ‘Drought’ is a meteorological term that denotes a period without rains during which soil water content is reduced and plants suffer from lack of water. Drought affects on the morphology anatomy and physiology of the plants. Physiological, biochemical, and anatomical responses however occur much earlier than the usual symptoms of wilting, which may be permanent or temporary depending on the availability of soil moisture.
The physiological, biochemical and molecular mechanism involved in cellular and whole plant responses to drought therefore generate considerable interest and are frequently reviewed (Ingram and Bartel 1996; Chakraborty et al. 2002; Kar 2002; Shinozaki et al. 2002; Yordanav et al. 2003; Francois Tardieu 2003; Upadhyaya and Panda 2004; Reddy et al. 2004; Jeyaramraja et al. 2005; Sakuma et al. 2006; Ohashi et al. 2006). Water stress results in stomatal closure and reduced transpirations rate, a decrease in water potential of plant tissues, decrease in photosysthesis and growth inhibition (Tahi et al. 2007), accumulation of abscisic acid (ABA), proline, mannitol, sorbitol, formation of radical scavenging compounds (ascorbate, glutathione, tocopherol etc) and systhesis of proteins. Decrease in photosysthesis is due to the limitted CO2 assimilation caused by stomatal closure and decrease is total chlorophyll content. Osmotic adjustment has been considered as beneficial to drought tolerant mechanism in field crop species. Na+ and K+ content of leaf affect and regulates the osmotic potential of the plant during stress conditions and hence Na+/ K+ ratio should be adequate for stress acclimatization by plant through osmotic adjustment .
However, there is no report on the changes of these ions in response to drought in Camellia sinensis. The lowering of osmotic potential by adjustment also minimizes the opportunity for significant water loss to occur from leaf tissue. This helps cells of higher plants to withstand water deficit by maintaining sufficient turgor to proceed (Grima and Krieg 1992 a,b) . Water stress induced pigment degradation, gross decline in protein level, increased proline content, carbohydrate status, lipid peroxidation, in plants have also been reviewed (Kar 2002). Tea is second only to water as the most consumed beverage in the world. It has been used medicinally for centuries in India and China. Green tea is comparatively healthier than black and olong tea. The active constituents in green tea are powerful antioxidants called polyphenols (catechins) and flavonols. Research shows that tea consumption is healthy and help fighting various health problems which has also been reviewed by many authors (Kabir 2002; Higdon and Frei, 2003; Cabrera et al., 2006).
Tea is one of the most important economic crops in Barak/Brahmaputra valley/ Dooars and other hilly terrains of India (i.e. Darjeeling, Himachal, Nilgiri and Uttaranchal). Tea plant being perennial crops is subjected to different environmental stress, drought being one of the important amongst them. In N.E. India, generally tea suffers from drought during November to April. In this region irrigation is increasingly used as an insurance against drought to maintain the productivity of tea during this period. The influence of irrigation on the potential yield of tea in this region has also been studied (Panda et al., 2003). Thus the present investigation was undertaken for understanding the mechanism of drought stress induced physiological and biochemical alterations in selected clone of Camellia sinensis L (O) Kuntze. Drought tolerance in tea can be assessed through some physiological and biochemical parameters under moisture stress and these parameters can be used as selection criteria for drought tolerance in the selection and breeding programs of tea (Handique and Manivel 1990). In the present experiment, the field soil was used in the pot. The aim was to test the responses of selected clones to drought stress imposed by withholding water in the pot. Such pot experiments have been used to asses the drought tolerance in plants (Chakraborty et al., 2002; Sharma and Kumar, 2005, Xu and Zhou, 2007, etc).
However, the field conditions were different from pot as the tea is a deep rooted plant and soil area is not limited it can penetrate the soil deep and it is obvious that it can withstand more days of dehydration stress in the field condition. During the period of natural drought plant encounters long period without rain as it is grown in rainfed ecosystem. Thus it is quite relevant to evaluate drought responses of plant like tea in potted conditions and correlate its responses in relation to field performance as because all the plants were grown in the same size pots and under same environmental conditions.
2 Materials and Methods
Four commonly growing clonal varieties of Camellia sinensis L. (O) Kuntze (viz. TV-1, TV-20, TV-29 & TV-30) seedlings of uniform age, one and half year old were procured from. Tocklai Tea Research Station, Silcoori, Silchar.
The seedlings grown in field soil in polyethene sleeves were procured from the nursery of near by tea Garden of Durgakona and brought to the laboratory. The seedlings were potted after removing polyethene sleeves and adding field soil. The plants were acclimatized for 10-15 days in laboratory conditions and were grown under natural light with well irrigation.
As tea is a shade loving plant, the seedlings were grown in a shed where the intensity of light ranges from 150-300 mol m2 s1 and 200-400 mol m2 s1 inside and outside the shed respectively. All control and treated plants were kept in similar growth conditions during acclimatization and treatment imposition.
After 10-15 days of acclimatization, drought is imposed by withholding water for 20 days. Well watered plant is considered as control. The level of stress was quantified by measuring changes in soil moisture and RWC of leaf in stressed plant relative to control. After dehydration, soil moisture content decreased to (12.88 ± 1.34)% and (3.55 ± 0.28)% after 10 and 20d of stress imposition respectively relative to control (23.46 ± 1.62)%. The average temperature range during experimental period was noted as 25.1 – 32.3°C and 12.5 – 24.7°C max/min respectively. The average relative humidity during the experiment period was 88-96% and 38-67% morning/afternoon respectively. All the leaf samplings were done during morning hours between 8 am to 9 am.
Fresh mass of leaf was measured in three replicates using five leaves and expressed as g leaf -1. For dry mass measurement same leaves were oven dried at 80°C for 48 h and expressed as g leaf -1. The relative gain in leaf total fresh mass was determined as relative growth rate (RGR, [g d-1] of leaf or the increase in total leaf fresh mass per unit of existing mass per unit time), and calculated according to the formula:
Tea leaves were sampled, oven dried and digested in a HNO3-HCl (3:1, v/v) mixture and Na+ and K+ concentrations were determined by Flame Photometer (Systronics, India) (Jackson, 1973).
The stability of leaf membranes, was assessed by determining leakage of electrolytes from leaf discs placed in 20 ml of deionised water for 24 h at room temperature and measuring the electrical conductivity before and after autoclaving the samples and Electrolytic leakage was determined as described by Dionisio Sese and Tobita (1998) and calculated using formula.
Proline concentration in tea leaves was determined following the method of Bates et al. (1973). Leaf sample (0.5 g) was homogenized with 5 ml of sulfosalicylic acid (3%) using mortar and pestle and filtered through Whatman No.1 filter paper. The volume of filtrate was made upto 10 ml with sulfosalicylic acid and 2.0 ml of filtrate was incubated with 2.0 ml glacial acetic acid and 2.0 ml ninhydrin reagent and boiled in a water bath at 100°C for 30 min. After cooling the reaction mixture, 6.0 ml of toluene were added and after cyclomixing it, absorbance was read at 570 nm. Total phenolics were extracted from tea leaves in 80% (v/v) ethanol and were estimated as per the method of Mahadevan and Sridhar (1982) using Follin Ciocalteau reagent and Na2CO3.
Lipid peroxidation was measured as the amount of TBARS determined by the thiobarbituric acid (TBA) reaction as described by Heath and Packer (1968). The leaf tissues (0.2 g) were homogenised in 2.0 ml of 0.1% (w/v trichloroacetic acid (TCA). The homogenate was centrifuged at 10,000g for 20 min. To 1.0 ml of the resulting supernatent, 1.0 ml of TCA (20%) containing 10.5% (w/v) of TBA and 10 L (4% in ethanol) BHT (butylated hydroxytolune) were added. The mixture was heated at 95°C for 30min in a water bath and then cooled in rice. The contents were centrifuged at 10,000 g for 15 min and the absorbancy was measured at 532 nm and corrected for 600 nm. The concentration of MDA were calculated using extinction coefficient of 155 mM-1cm-1.
Leaf tissues were homogenized with potassium phosphate buffer pH 6.8 (0.1M) containing 0.1 mM EDTA, 1% PVP and 0.1 mM PMSF in prechilled mortar pestle. The extract was centrifuged at 40C for 15 min at 17000 g in a refrigerated cooling centrifuge. The supernatant was used for the assay of polyphenol oxidase (PPO). PPO were assayed using pyrogallol as substrate in 1.0 ml of enzyme extract. according to Kar and Mishra (1976). After incubations at 25°C for 5 min, the reaction was stopped with additions of 1.0 ml of 10 % H2SO4. The purpurogallin formed was read at 430 nm. 1 unit of enzyme activity is defined as that amount of enzyme which forms 1 u mole of purpurogallin formed per minute under the assay conditions. Total soluble protein content was estimated as per the method of Bradford (1976) using BSA as standard.
Nitrate Reductase (NR) activity in tea leaves was extracted and estimated as per the methods of Singh and Mallik (1980). The enzyme extracted in 0.1M phosphate buffer (pH7.2) and the homogenate was centrifuged in cooling centrifuge at 10,000 g at -4°C. The resulting supernatant was used for the assay of enzyme activity. The assay mixture comprised of 1.0 ml phosphate buffer (0.1M) (pH7.2), 0.5 ml NADH (1.5 mM), 0.5 ml distilled water and 1.0 ml enzyme extract. It is then incubated at 25°C. The enzyme reaction was initiated by adding 0.5 ml KNO3 (0.1 M) and incubated for 30 min. Then 0.8 ml zinc acetate (0.1 M) was added and centrifuged and 3.0 ml of the supernatant was retained. To this 2.0 ml [1% sulfanilamide in 1.5 N HCl and 0.2% N-naphthalene diamine hydrochloride (NEDH)], mixed in equal volume was added. After 10 min absorbency was read at 540 nm. NR activity was expressed as moles NO2 min-1.g-1 FW.
Each experiment was done in triplicate and repeated thrice and data presented are mean standard error (SE). The results were subjected to ANOVA using GLM factorial model on all the parameters. Tukey test was used for comparision between pairs of treatments. For relationship between relative water content and proline accumulation, K+ content of leaf and its RWC, lipid peroxidation and solute leakage of leaf tissue, lipid peroxidation and decrease in RWC of leaf , relative growth rate of leaf and changes in total chlorophyll content a linear regression was performed. The data analysis were carried out using statistical package SPSS 7.5.
|
Relative growth rate (RGR) of leaf showed uniformly decline trend with progressive soil moisture stress in all the tested clones (Figure 1B). Changes in RGR of leaf due to10 d of stress imposition was minimum in TV-30 and TV-1 but after 20d of stress RGR changes among the clones was not significant though decrease growth was about 95%.The amount of solute leakage is an index of membrane damage. Drought induced increase in solute leakage in all the tested clones of Camellia sinensis (Figure 1A). After 20d of stress, in comparison with control plants solute leakage increases to 130.84, 89.75, 150 and 153.92% in TV-1, TV-17, TV-20, TV-29 and TV-30 respectively. However, TV-1 and TV-20 showed comparatively lesser amount of solute leakage during stress conditions. Relative water content (RWC) of leaf uniformly decreased with decreasing soil moisture content imposed by 20 d of water withholding (Figure 1C). After 20 d of drought, RWC of leaf was found to be 56.26±1.21, 52.87±1.08, 44.99±0.43 and 52.66±1.03% relative to control with 92.15±1.24, 90.21±2.83, 87.57± 6.11 and 91.64± 4.92 % in TV-1, TV-20, TV-29 and TV-30.
The contents of Na+ ion increased with the progress of water stress imposition, apparently showing highest Na+ content in TV-29 (41.73%) with lowest in TV-1 as a result of 20 d of drought stress in comparision with control plants (Figure 2A). On the other hand, water stress induced decrease in K accumulation was observed in leaves of Camellia sinensis , but highest K+ content was maintained by TV-1 (27.16%) and TV-29 (13.85%) even after 20 d of drought imposition as depicted in Figure 2B. There was increase in Na+/ K+ ratio with progressive days of water withholding in TV-20 (105.80%), TV-29 (64.58%) & TV-30 (283.25%), but with exception TV-1 (37.09%) showed decrease in Na+/ K+ ratio with the increasing intensity of drought stress (Figure 2C).
|
Photosynthetic pigments (chlorophyll and carotenoid) content was found to be decreased with increasing days of stress imposition. Drought induced degradation of chlorophyll and carotenoid was maximum in TV-29 (57.91 & 82.38%) and TV-20 (55.10 & 86.13%) respectively as depicted in Figure 3A & B. Phenolic compounds are widely distributed in plants and are mainly produced to protect plants from stress, ROS, wounds, UV light, disease and herbivores (Dixon and Paiva 1995). Total phenolics content in tea includes catechins and polyphenols, which was found to be decreased with the imposition of drought (Figure 3C). Maximum decrease in phenolics content was observed in TV-20(37.63%) and TV-2928.15%).
|
Increase in compatible solutes like proline, Glycine betain etc., is the characteristic feature of plants acclimatizing stress conditions. In this study proline accumulation during water stress condition was maximum in TV-1 (Figure 4A). Drought stress induced significant increase in PPO activity was observed in all the tested tea cultivars, maximum increase being shown by TV-29 (Figure 4B). Highest PPO activity was shown by TV-29 (458.82%) and TV-1 (424.91%). MDA content was maximum in TV-29 (420.41%) after 20 d of stress imposition, whereas TV-30(58.95%) showed minimum increase as compared to control plant (Figure 4C).
|
As indicated in Figure 5A, NR activity decreased due to drought in four clones of tea, where minimum decrease was observed in TV-1 (62.59%) and TV-30 (72.03%), that could be correlated with stress induced decrease in total soluble protein content in tested clones of Camellia sinensis (Figure 5B).
|
The interesting aspect in this study is that there was no significant correlation between relative water content and changes in proline content of leaf (r2 = 0.15, ns) (Figure 6A). In our study, increase in Na+ content is followed by significant decrease in K+ content of leaf which is significantly correlated with decrease in RWC of leaf (r2=0.50, p<0.01) as depicted in Figure 6B. Concomitant with the increase in MDA content of leaf amount of solute leakage also increased which was evident from the significant correlation (r2=0.66, p<0.001) between increase in lipid peroxidation and amount of solute leakage as shown in Figure 6C. Increase in MDA content is significantly correlated. with decrease in RWC of leaf (r2 = 0.39, p<0.05) as depicted in Figure 6D. There was significant correlation between chlorophyll degradation and RGR of leaf (r2 = 0.40, p<0.05) (Figure 6E).
Figure 6 Relationship between relative water content and proline accumulation (A), K+ content of leaf and its RWC (B), lipid peroxidation and solute leakage of leaf tissue (C), lipid peroxidation and decrease in RWC of leaf (D), relative growth rate of leaf and changes in total chlorophyll content in four clonal varieties of Camellia sinensis subjected to drought. The open square, closed triangle, open circle and closed circle denotes TV-1, TV-20, TV-29 and TV-30 variety of tea subjected to drought treatment respectively. *, ** and *** indicates significant correlation at P<.05,.01 and .001 respectively. |
4 Discussion
Acknowledgement
References
Arnon D. I., 1949, Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts. Polyphenol oxidase in Beta vulgaris, Plant Physiology, 29, 1 – 15.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.24.1.1
Bars H. D., and Weatherly P. E., 1962, Are examination of the relative turgidity technique for estimating water deficit in leaves, Australian Journal of Biological Science, 15, 413-428.
Bates L.S., Waldern R.P., and Teare I. K., 1973, Rapid determination of free proline for water stress studies, Plant and Soil, 39 , 205 – 207.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00018060
Boyer J. S., 1982, Plant productivity and environment, Science, 218 , 443-448.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.218.4571.443
Bradford M. M., 1976, A rapid and sensitive method for the quantification of microgram quantities of protein utilising the principal of protein-dye binding, Analytical Biochemistry, 72, 248-254.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3
Cabrera C., Artacho R., and Gimenez R., 2006, Benefecial effect of green tea- A Review, Journal of American College of Nutrition, 25(2), 79-99.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07315724.2006.10719518
Caia Y., Luob Q., Sunc M., and Corke H., 2004, Antioxidant activity and phenolics compounds of 112 traditional Chinese medicinal plants associated with anticancer. Life Science, 74, 2157–2184.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2003.09.047
Chakraborty V., Dutta S., and Chakraborty B.N., 2002, Responses of tea plant to water stress, Biologia Plantarum, 45(4), 557-562.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1022377126056
Dionisio-Sese M.L., and Tobita S., 1998, Antioxidant responses of rice seedlings to salinity stress, Plant Science, 135(1), 1-9.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9452(98)00025-9
Dixon R. A., and Paiva N.L., 1995, Stress-induced phenylpropanoid metabolism. Plant Cell, 7, 1085–1097.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1105/tpc.7.7.1085
Egilla J.N., Davies F.T., and Drew M.C., 2001. Effect of potassium on drought resistance of Hibiscus rosa chinensis cv. Leprechaun: plant growth, leaf macro- and micro nutrient content and root longevity. Plant and Soil 229, 213-224.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1004883032383
http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.117.1.283
Francois T., 2003, Virtual plants : Modelling as a tool for the genomics of tolerance of water defecit. Trends in Plant Science, 8(1), 9-14.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1360-1385(02)00008-0
Grima F.S., and Krieg D.A., 1992 b, Osmotic adjustment of sorghurn II. Relationship to gas exchange rates, Plant Physiology 99, 583-588.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.99.2.583
http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.99.2.577
Handique A.C., and Manivel L., 1990, Selection Criteria for drought tolerance in tea. The Assam Review and Tea News, 79, 18-21.
Heath R.L., and Packer L., 1968, Photoperoxidation in isolated chlorplasts: I. Kinetics and stoichiometry of fatty acid peroxidation, Archieves in Biochemistry Biophysics, 125 ,189 – 198.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0003-9861(68)90654-1
Higdon J.V., and Frei B., 2003, Tea Catechins and Polyphenols : Health effects, metabolism and antioxidant function, Critical Review Food Science and Nutrition, 43, 89-143.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10408690390826464
Ingram J., and Bartels D., 1996, The molceular basis of dehydration tolerance in plants, Annual Review in Plant Physiology Plant Molecular Biology, 47, 377-403.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.47.1.377
Jackson M.L., 1973, Soil Chemical Analysis. - Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi.
Jeyaramraja P.R., Meenakshi S.N., Kumar R.S., Joshi S. D., and Ramasubramanian B., 2005, Water deficit induced oxidative damage in tea ( Camellia sinensis) plants, Journal of Plant Physiology, 162, 413-419.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2004.09.004
Kabir S.E., 2002, Present Tea scenarios and tips on efficient management practices, The Assam Review and Tea News, 19(3) , 8-13.
Kar R.K., 2002, Studying the plant response to water stress: An Overview. In S. K. Panda (eds) Advances in Stress Physiology of plants . scientific Publishers, India, Pp 61-79.
Kar M., and Mishra D., 1976, Catalase, Peroxidase and Polyphenol oxidase activities during rice leaf senescence. Plant Physiology, 57 , 315-319.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.57.2.315
Kojima M., and Takeuchi W., 1989, Detection and characterization of p-coumaric acid hydroxylase in mung bean, Vigna mungo seedlings. Journal of Biochemistry, 105, 265–270.
Mahadevan A., and Sridhar R., 1982, Methods in physiological plant pathology( India, Sivakami Publication) 2nd Edition.).
Martiniz J.P., Ledent J.F., Bajji M., Kinet J.M., and Lutls S., 2003. Effect of water stress on growth, Na+ and K+ accumulation and water use efficiency in relation to osmotic adjustment in two populations of Artiplex haliums L., Plant Growth Regulation, 41, 63-73.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1027359613325
Matysik J., Ali B.B., and Mohanty P., 2002, Molecular mechanism of quenching of reactive oxygen species by proline under water stress in plants. Current. Science, 82, 525 – 532.
Mayer A.M., and Harel E., 1991, Phenoloxidases and their significance in fruit and vegetables, in: P.F. Fox (Ed.), Food Enzymology, Elsevier, New York, pp. 373–398.
Nakayama T., Yonekura-Sakakibara K., Sato T., Kikuchi S., Fukui Y., Fukuchi-Mizutani M., Ueda T., Nakao M., Tanaka Y., Kusumi T., and Nishino T., 2000, Aureusidin synthase: a polyphenol oxidase homolog responsible for flower coloration, Science, 290, 1163–1166.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.290.5494.1163
Ohashi Y., Nakayama N., Saneoka1 H., and Fujita K., 2006, Effects of drought stress on photosynthetic gas exchange, chlorophyll fluorescence and stem diameter of soybean plants. Biologia Plantarum, 50 (1), 138-141.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10535-005-0089-3
Osmond C.B., Bjorkman O., and Anderson D.J., 1980, Physiological process in plant ecology. Springer –Verlag, New York.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-67637-6
Panda R.K., Stephens W., and Modhews R., 2003, Modelling the influence of irrigation on the potential yield of tea (Camellia sinensis) in North-East India, Experimental Agriculture, 39, 181-198.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0014479702001151
Panda S.K., 2002, Water stress induced changes in nitrate reductase activity in excised wheat (Triticum aestivum L) leaves, Journal of Indian Botanical Society, 81, 351-352.
Reddy A.R., Chaitanya K., and Vivekanandan M., 2004, Drought-induced responses of photosynthesis and antioxidant metabolism in higher plants, Journal of Plant Physiology, 161, 1189–1202.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2004.01.013
Sakuma Y., Maruyama K., Osakabe Y., Qin F., Seki M., Shinozaki K., and Yamaguchi-Shinozakia K., 2006,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1105/tpc.105.035881
Sankar B., Jaleel C.A., Manivannan P., Kishorekumar A., Somasundaram R., and Panneerselvam R, 2007, Drought-induced biochemical modifications and proline metabolism in Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench. Acta Botanica Croatia, 66 (1), 43–56.
Sharma P., and Kumar S., 2005. Differential display-mediated identification of three drought responsive expressed sequence tags in tea [ Camellia sinensis (L) O. Kuntze], Journal of Biosciences, 30 (2), 101-105.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02703703
Sheshshayee M.S., Bindumadhava H., Rachaputi N.R., Prasad T.G., and Udaykumar M., 2006, Leaf chlorophyll concentration relates to transpiration efficiency in peanut. Annals of Applied Biology, 148, 7-15.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.2005.00033.x
Singh M.B., and Mallik C.P., 1980, Plant enzyme assay some examples. In : Plant Enzymology and Histoenzymology. Kalyan Publishers, New Delhi, India , pp 47-84.
SubbaZ01, Glycine betaine accumulation, ionic and water relation of red-beet at constasting level of sodium supply, Journal of Plant Physiology, 158, 767-776.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1078/0176-1617-00309
Tahi H., Wahbi S., Wakrim R., Aganchich B., Serraj R., and Centritto M., 2007, Water relations, photosynthesis, growth and water-use efficiency in tomato plants subjected to partial rootzone drying and regulated deficit irrigation, Plant Biosystems, 141, 265 – 274.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/11263500701401927
Tona L., Cimangac R.K., Mesia K., Musuambaa Ct., De Bruyne T., Apers S., Hernans N., Van Miert S., Pieters L., Totte J., and Vlietinck A.J., 2004, In vitro antiplasmodial activity of extracts and fractions from seven medicinal plants used in the Democratic Republic of Congo, Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 93, 27–32.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2004.02.022
Upadhyaya H., and Panda S.K., 2004, Responses of Camellia sinensis to drought and rehydration. Biologia Plantarum 48(4), 597-600.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:BIOP.0000047158.53482.37
Wu Q.S., Xia R.X., Zou Y.N., and Wang G.Y., 2007, Osmotic solute responses of mycorrhizal citrus (Poncirus trifoliata) seedlings to drought stress, Acta Physiologia Plantarum, 29, 543–549
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11738-007-0065-y
Xu Z.Z., and Zhou G.S., 2006, Combined effects of water stress and high temperature on photosynthesis nitrogen metabolism and lipid peroxidation of a perennial grass Leymus chinensis, Planta, DOI 10.1007/s00425 006-5.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1626/pps.10.277
Yordanov I., Velikova V., and Tsonev T., 2003, Plant responses to drought and stress tolerance, Bulg Journal of Plant Physiology, Special Issue, 187-206.
. PDF(2115KB)
. FPDF(win)
. HTML
. Online fPDF
Associated material
. Readers' comments
Other articles by authors
. Upadhyaya H.
. Dutta B.K.
. Panda S.K.
Related articles
. Drought
. Relative growth rate(RGR)
. Chlorophyll
. Phenols
. Proline
. Lipid peroxidation
. Camellia sinensis
Tools
. Email to a friend
. Post a comment